The Liability of 10,000 Free Subscribers
Why you're writing “content” instead of art.
It feels like winning.
You watch the counter tick up. 100. 1,000. 10,000.
The system is designed to make you watch the counter. The dopamine hit is real, and the platform wants you to have it. Because if you’re chasing the number, you’re feeding the beast.
But for most creators, a list of 10,000 free, unengaged subscribers isn’t an asset. It’s a liability.
Here’s why.
1. The Signal-to-Noise Ratio
When you send an email to 10,000 people and only 2,000 open it, you haven’t just failed to reach 8,000 people. You’ve sent a signal to Gmail, Yahoo, and Apple.
The signal says: “This is noise.”
The feedback loop kicks in. Because 80% of your list ignored you, the spam filters begin to treat you with suspicion. Next week, your email doesn’t even make it to the 2,000 people who actually cared. It ends up in the Promotions tab, or worse, the Junk folder.
The tourists on your list are actively preventing you from reaching the true fans.
2. The Drift to the Middle
This is the subtle killer.
When you write for 10,000 strangers, you start to armor yourself. You sand off the edges. You hold back the specific, weird, challenging work that attracted your first 100 fans, because you’re afraid of the unsubscribe notification.
You start writing for the median reader. You start writing “content” instead of art.
You collapse to the center.
And the center is crowded.
3. The Cost of Support
Tourists are demanding. They are the ones who reply to correct your grammar, or to complain that you didn’t cover their specific issue, or to ask for free advice.
They pay you in attention, which you cannot spend, and they cost you in emotional labor, which is your most precious resource.
The Alternative
Imagine a list of 500 people.
Every one of them opens the email.
Every one of them would miss you if you didn’t show up on Tuesday.
Fifty of them pay you $100 a year.
That’s $5,000 a year. That’s a nice vacation. Or a new computer. Or the freedom to take a week off to think.
But more importantly, it’s a tribe.
The goal of the Sovereign Creator is not to build a stadium and fill it with people looking for free entertainment. The strategy is to build a campfire.
If you have 10,000 people on your list who don’t care, delete them.
It feels scary. It feels like you’re destroying value.
But you’re not. You’re cleaning the lens.
Better to whisper to a friend than to shout at a crowd that’s walking away.
How to Build Authentically
Before you can choose who to keep on your list, you have to choose yourself.
People often ask how to build a business that feels authentic. My answer (almost) always points into the same direction: archetypes.
For years in my branding studio, I used archetypes as a strategic tool to help clients stand out. They are powerful for that. But my own journey has taught me that this is just the surface. Brand archetypes are an echo of a much deeper truth rooted in the work of Carl Jung.
Archetypes are not just a great tool for branding tool. They are the source code of who you actually are.
Building a business from the inside out requires that you see the unconscious patterns that are already shaping your work. Your fears. Your shadows. Your deepest desires.
I had to go on a long, messy journey to connect these dots for myself. I want to give you a more direct starting point.
That’s why I created The Archetype Navigator.
It is a powerful first step into this deeper conversation. In 5 minutes, it will help you:
Uncover the pattern that defines your most natural and powerful way of creating value.
See the unconscious patterns that lead to your self-sabotage and burnout.
Move from feeling lost to having a powerful language for your strengths and a clear direction for your work.
It’s free. And it might be the most useful five minutes you spend on your work this week.



Archetypes, whether Jungian or other, are also great to revisit. Because as life moves on and we stack experiences, each time we return, we can get a new insight.
So I'm going to look into my Creator archetype now and see what's new there for me to see.
"I always used to remove from my list the people who hadn’t opened emails for 2 or 3 months, and I actually enjoyed it. But I noticed that the open rate always stayed the same, no matter how much the list shrank—it was always around 40–50%. So I stopped deleting so often.